Skip to content
UÇKHistory and Memory

Teaching resources

For teachers

The teaching materials are in development. The structure below shows the planned units and the primary sources that can already be used.

Editorial status: Awaiting verificationDrafted from the cited sources; not yet fully reviewed by the editors.

Contents (3)
  1. 01Approach
  2. 02Trauma-sensitive teaching
  3. 03How to use the units

The teaching units below are an initial framework for secondary-school and university teachers. They link to the history chapters and to primary sources that can already be used.

Approach

Teaching the Kosovo War aims to build pupils' ability to work with sources, to distinguish fact from interpretation and to understand the human experiences behind events. The goal is not to memorize a single narrative but to understand how historical knowledge is built.

Each unit includes a summary, discussion questions and sources from the archive's registry. Teachers can adapt the units to their pupils' age and to the time available.

Trauma-sensitive teaching

Many classrooms include pupils whose families were directly affected by the war, the expulsions or disappearances. Give advance notice of difficult topics, offer the option of not taking part in personal discussions and avoid showing graphic material.

Do not ask pupils to share family experiences in front of the class. When they choose to, respect the account without testing it as a source. Help them distinguish personal memory from historical analysis, and keep discussion away from collective accusations against any people.

How to use the units

The units follow a chronological order but can also be used individually. For each one, start with the key question, read one primary and one secondary source, and finish with a discussion of what we know, what we do not know, and why.

Full teaching materials — worksheets, printable maps and assessment guidance — are in development. Teachers who would like to share their experience can do so through the contribution page.

Chapters

  1. 01

    Autonomy and its abolition (1974–1990)

    The 1974 Yugoslav constitution gave Kosovo its own institutions within the federation. This unit examines the 1981 demonstrations, the rise of Serbian nationalism in the 1980s, the 1989 miners' strike and the constitutional changes that removed Kosovo's autonomy.

    • What powers did Kosovo have under the 1974 constitution, and which remained outside its control?
    • How did the authorities of the time present the events of 1981, and how do historians explain them today?
    • Why did the Trepça miners' strike become a symbol of resistance?
    • Which primary sources would you need to reconstruct the process by which autonomy was abolished?
    1981–1989
  2. 02

    Peaceful resistance and the parallel schools (1990–1997)

    After mass dismissals and the closure of Albanian-language institutions, Kosovo Albanians built a parallel system of education, health care and funding. This unit examines the strategy of peaceful resistance, its achievements and its limits.

    • How did parallel education in private homes work, and what sacrifices did it demand of teachers and pupils?
    • What do oral-history interviews reveal about everyday life in the 1990s?
    • What were the arguments for the peaceful strategy, and what criticisms were raised against it?
    1989–1995
  3. 03

    The emergence of armed resistance

    This unit follows the underground networks of the 1980s and 1990s, the public emergence of the KLA and the factors behind its growth after 1997, with particular attention to the differing accounts of the organization's origins.

    • Why are there different accounts of the KLA's origins, and how do historians compare them?
    • How did Dayton and the 1997 crisis in Albania affect the debate between peaceful and armed strategies?
    • Why did the labels applied to the KLA change depending on the actor and the period?
    1996–1997
  4. 04

    War and expulsion (1998–1999)

    This unit examines the escalation of the conflict in 1998, crimes against civilians and the mass expulsions of spring 1999, using contemporaneous reports, court findings and personal testimony.

    • What is the difference between a verification mission report, a judgment and a personal testimony as sources for the same event?
    • Why do figures for the refugees of 1999 vary by source?
    • How can one write about crimes by naming the responsible structures without blaming a people?
    • What do refugees' accounts tell us that statistics do not?
    1999
  5. 05

    Diplomacy and NATO's intervention

    From the OSCE verification mission to Rambouillet, the air campaign and Resolution 1244: this unit examines diplomatic decisions, the debate over the legality of the intervention and the civilian victims of the bombing.

    • What did the Rambouillet draft provide for, and why did one side sign while the other did not?
    • What does it mean for an intervention to be judged “illegal but legitimate”?
    • How can the significance of the intervention be acknowledged alongside the right of civilian victims of the bombing to be remembered?
    1999
  6. 06

    Justice, individual responsibility and memory

    This unit explains how international and domestic criminal courts work, the difference between an indictment and a judgment, and the ways a society can remember victims without collective blame.

    • Why is an indictment not proof of guilt, and what makes a judgment final?
    • What does it mean that a decision concerning individuals is not a decision against a people or a war?
    • How does the Kosovo Memory Book count victims, and why does the method matter?
    • How can all victims be remembered without equating responsibility?
    The postwar period and legacy

Last reviewed:

Report an inaccuracy