Skip to content
UÇKHistory and Memory

Kosovo Specialist Chambers · KSC-BC-2023-12

Specialist Prosecutor v. Hashim Thaçi, Bashkim Smakaj, Isni Kilaj, Fadil Fazliu and Hajredin Kuçi (administration of justice)

Procedural status: Trial ongoingOffences against the administration of justice · Proceedings in the 2020s

Editorial status: Awaiting verificationDrafted from the cited sources; not yet fully reviewed by the editors.

Procedural status

From investigation to final decision. Where does the case stand today?

Path of the case

Stage 3 of 6: Trial

  1. Investigation
  2. Indictment
  3. Trial
  4. First instance
  5. Appeal
  6. Final

Stage 3 of 6: Trial

Trial ongoing

The trial has begun; there is no judgment.

There is no judgment yet.

Appeal status:There is no judgment yet.

A judgment concerning individuals is not automatically a judgment against a people, a war, or every member of an organization.

Outcome for each accused

No decision yet(5)

  • Hashim Thaçi

    Detained in case KSC-BC-2020-06 during the charged period

    Outcome:No judgment yet

    Not applicable
  • Bashkim Smakaj

    Per the indictment, former director of the Kosovo Intelligence Agency

    Outcome:No judgment yet

    Not applicable
  • Isni Kilaj

    Per the indictment, former KLA member in Malishevë

    Outcome:No judgment yet

    Not applicable
  • Fadil Fazliu

    Per the indictment, KLA veteran

    Outcome:No judgment yet

    Not applicable
  • Hajredin Kuçi

    Per the indictment, member of Kadri Veseli's defence team during the charged period

    Outcome:No judgment yet

    Not applicable

Charges and alleged conduct

According to the indictment, from April to November 2023, during detention visits, Thaçi gave the others confidential information about prosecution witnesses and instructed them to influence their testimony. All accused have pleaded not guilty.

Period covered by the charges:At least 12 April – 2 November 2023

Charges

  • Attempted obstruction of official persons
  • Violating the secrecy of proceedings
  • Contempt of court

Procedural history

  1. Confirmed indictment

    The indictment is confirmed.

  2. Indictment made public

    The indictment is made public.

  3. Trial opened

    The trial opens before the Single Trial Judge.

  4. Closing statements

    Closing statements, 10–14 September 2026; all defence teams sought acquittal.

Last verified:

Verification note:The trial concluded with closing statements on 14 September 2026; judgment is pending. The count numbering per accused should be verified against the public indictment.

Report an inaccuracy